18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodride SA37 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Goodride
SA37
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
1
15
Best position
#9
#1
#2
Average position
9.0
1.0
9.0
Latest test
2022
2025
2025
Available sizes
78
66
226

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodride SA37
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodride SA37
75%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet braking
Goodride SA37
63%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodride SA37
94%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet handling
Goodride SA37
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Dry
Goodride SA37
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Goodride SA37
72%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Goodride SA37
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Comfort
Goodride SA37
91%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Goodride SA37
91%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Costs
Goodride SA37
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodride SA37
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store