18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodride SA37 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Test Profile

Goodride
SA37
Hankook
ION Evo
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
1
1
33
Best position
#9
#1
#1
Average position
9.0
1.0
4.1
Latest test
2022
2025
2025
Available sizes
78
66
658

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodride SA37
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodride SA37
75%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Wet braking
Goodride SA37
63%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodride SA37
94%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Wet handling
Goodride SA37
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Dry
Goodride SA37
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry handling
Goodride SA37
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Dry braking
Goodride SA37
72%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%
Comfort
Goodride SA37
91%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Exterior noise
Goodride SA37
91%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
Costs
Goodride SA37
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Rolling resistance
Goodride SA37
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store