Segment
1. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost2. Viking WinTech Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Giti winter tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Viking (53%). In this particular case, the Giti Gitiwinter W2 has a better rating of 59% compared to 53% of the Viking WinTech. The first tyre test of Giti Gitiwinter W2 was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the Viking WinTech first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the winter W2 and the WinTech were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Giti Gitiwinter W2
| Viking WinTech
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost2. Viking WinTech Lowcost
1. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.772. Viking WinTech 20.83
2. Viking WinTech Recommended
1. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | 37,9 | 31,2 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||