Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda SportControl 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda SportControl 2
| BFGoodrich Advantage
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Comparing two summer tyres Fulda SportControl 2 and BFGoodrich Advantage, based on various tests, reviews, and ratings from our tyre tests website.
Fulda SportControl 2
The Fulda SportControl 2 secured a superior position over BFGoodrich Advantage during the Autobild test, scoring 13th out of 51 tyres, underscoring its commendable performance. The tyre excels in aquaplaning with good reserves, ensuring users can achieve shorter braking distances, on both wet and dry ground. Its solid farm factor is a good price-performance ratio.
However, it does have some notable drawbacks. The tyre's steering response is somewhat delayed, posing a slight issue. Moreover, its overall running performance is passable, but some users may find this unsatisfactory.
Overall, the Fulda SportControl 2 has a solid rating of 74%, making it a reliable summer tyre choice. No newer tyre model has replaced this yet. To know more about Fulda TYres, visit here.
BFGoodrich Advantage
The BFGoodrich Advantage follows behind Fulda when it comes to test rankings, bagging the 20th position in the Autobild test. On the brighter side, though, the tyre's best feature is its comfort aspect, which distinctly stood out.
On dry tracks, it presents stable driving behaviour and short braking distances, and an appreciable silent rolling comfort. However, there's room for improvement in its handling behaviour as it tends to understeer, and the braking distances extend when driving in wet conditions.
Considering the above features, the BFGoodrich Advantage has earned a rating of 68% on our platform. It hasn't been replaced with any newer tyre, suggesting it continues to be a decent choice. For more about BFGoodrich, visit here.
The Verdict
Summarising the tests, it appears that the Fulda SportControl 2 outperforms the BFGoodrich Advantage principally in its superior aquaplaning performance and braking distances. While both tyres have some room for improvement, they offer good price-performance ratios. It's always critical to consider your specific requirements before picking the right tyre.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda SportControl 2 11.072. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36.2 | 33.9 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36.2 | 31.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36,5 | 29,4 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
