18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Fulda
EcoControl HP
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
6
11
10
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
9.8
11.6
6.0
Latest test
2018
2024
2026
Available sizes
70
122
109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
90%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda EcoControl HP
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda EcoControl HP
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Wet handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Costs
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Mileage
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Price/value
Fulda EcoControl HP
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Rolling resistance
Fulda EcoControl HP
51%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Comfort
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Exterior noise
Fulda EcoControl HP
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Dry
Confidence
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry handling
Fulda EcoControl HP
96%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store