Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Budget

Fulda

EcoControl HP

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

Test Profile

EcoControl HP

Efficient Grip Performance

Dynaxer HP4

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

6

16

11

10

Best position

#6

#3

#1

#2

Average position

9.8

5.5

11.6

6.0

Latest test

2018

2023

2024

2026

Available sizes

70

153

122

109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Fulda EcoControl HP

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Wet handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

Fulda EcoControl HP

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet circle cornering

Fulda EcoControl HP

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Costs

Confidence

Fulda EcoControl HP

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Mileage

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Price/value

Fulda EcoControl HP

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

23%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Rolling resistance

Fulda EcoControl HP

51%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Comfort

Confidence

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Exterior noise

Fulda EcoControl HP

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Dry

Confidence

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dry handling

Fulda EcoControl HP

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Fulda EcoControl HP vs Fulda EcoControl HP2

Fulda EcoControl HP vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Fulda EcoControl HP vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContact

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponse

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Browse by brand

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

EcoControl HP

Efficient Grip Performance

Dynaxer HP4

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison