18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
21
20
18
3
3
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
3.5
6.1
3.7
1.3
Latest test
2024
2022
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
165
386
47
36
23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin Primacy 4
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store