18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

In this article, we will be comparing two popular summer tyres, the Firestone Roadhawk, and the Michelin Primacy 4. These tyres have been put to the test by various automotive organizations like ADAC, Autobild, and Autozeitung, and we'll be summarizing their strengths and weaknesses, as well as their overall performance in mutual tests.


Firestone Roadhawk
The Firestone Roadhawk is a summer tyre with an overall rating of 71%. In the 2022 ADAC test, it ranked 17th out of 17 tyres, with its best features being dry braking and wet circle cornering. Autobild also tested this tyre in 2021 and found its strengths to be dry handling, wet handling, and wet side guides, positioning it 10th out of 53 tested tyres. Finally, in the 2021 Autozeitung test, it ranked 12th out of 20 tyres, showing a strong dry steering response. Overall, the key strengths of the Firestone Roadhawk are its low fuel consumption, dry handling, and wet handling, while critics point out its weakness on wet surfaces and increased wear.


Michelin Primacy 4
The Michelin Primacy 4 is a touring summer tyre that replaced the previous model, Michelin Primacy 3, and has an overall rating of 90%. In the 2022 ADAC test, it ranked 5th out of 17 tyres, excelling in dry braking, wet circle cornering, safety, and mileage. Autobild tested the Michelin Primacy 4 also in 2022, ranking it 5th out of 53 tyres, highlighting its comfort and dry handling. Additionally, in the 2021 Autozeitung test, the tyre placed 3rd out of 20 tyres, with a strong wet circle cornering performance. The Primacy 4 has since been replaced by the Michelin Primacy 4+.


The Michelin Primacy 4 stands out with its excellent dry and wet handling, impressive mileage, and aquaplaning resistance. Furthermore, it exhibits high levels of comfort and low levels of wear. However, it has a higher price compared to some competitors.


Conclusion
Overall, the Michelin Primacy 4 is the clear winner in mutual tests against the Firestone Roadhawk. Of particular note is its superior handling capabilities on both dry and wet surfaces, impressive safety features, and excellent wear resistance, making it a well-rounded and high-quality summer tyre. While the Firestone Roadhawk delivers decent performance, it falls short in wet handling and wear resistance, detracting from its overall appeal.


For drivers looking for a summer tyre with a combination of performance, comfort, and safety, the Michelin Primacy 4 is a strong choice. Its strengths more than justify its higher price and make this tyre an excellent investment for a smooth and reliable driving experience. Furthermore, motorists keen to stay updated with the latest tyre technology can consider the Michelin Primacy 4+ for even more enhanced performance.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
21
20
3
14
5
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
3.5
3.7
5.5
2.2
Latest test
2024
2022
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
165
386
36
700
63

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin Primacy 4
68%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
28%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Fuel efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison