Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Roadhawk

CrossClimate 2 SUV

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

21

2

18

4

1

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

1.5

6.1

3.3

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

165

54

47

40

66

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk

CrossClimate 2 SUV

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison