18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
21
10
4
5
3
1
Best position
#2
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
6.0
3.3
2.2
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
165
109
40
63
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Comfort
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Costs
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store