18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
21
10
4
3
1
5
Best position
#2
#2
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
6.0
3.3
3.7
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
165
109
40
36
66
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Dry
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Comfort
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Costs
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store