18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Continental
SportContact 7
Number of tests
21
3
16
Best position
#2
#5
#1
Average position
11.9
7.3
1.2
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
165
59
124

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Continental SportContact 7
87%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental SportContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Continental SportContact 7
81%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison