18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Firestone RoadhawkUpper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5
R14 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
21
4
3
24
3
Best position
#2
#2
#4
#1
#2
Average position
11.9
3.3
4.3
2.7
3.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
165
40
99
302
36

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet performance
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Dry performance
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV carsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs BFGoodrich AdvantageGoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison