18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
21
4
3
3
28
Best position
#2
#2
#4
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
3.3
4.3
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
165
40
99
36
67

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store