18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Number of tests
21
4
18
1
7
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
3.3
6.1
1.0
2.4
Latest test
2024
2026
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
165
40
47
66
137

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
94%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
90%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
80%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
86%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
84%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
63%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
71%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
64%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
66%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Fuel efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison