18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Today, we are comparing two popular summer tyres: Firestone Roadhawk and Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance. Both tyres have proved their worth in a number of tests, so let's dive into the results and find out their strengths and weaknesses.


The Firestone Roadhawk scored an overall rating of 71% on our website. It performed well in Autoklub ČR and ADAC tests, securing positions 11 and 4, respectively, out of a total number of 16-19 tyres. The tyre stood out with its dry driving behavior, safety, and wet braking. In the Autobild test, it was ranked 3rd out of 51 compared tyres. However, Firestone Roadhawk has not been replaced by any newer model.


On the other hand, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance performed exceptionally well with a stellar overall rating of 88%. It ranked 8th in Autoklub ČR test, where its dry handling was especially appreciated, and 12th in the ADAC test with the best features being aquaplaning (cross) and aquaplaning (longitudinal). Furthermore, it took the 11th position in the Autobild test."""


It's important to note that Goodyear has already introduced a successor to the Efficient Grip Performance – the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, which is expected to offer even better performance.


In summary, both tyres performed commendably in various tests. While the Firestone Roadhawk excels in dry driving behavior, safety, and wet braking, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance scores better in overall test positions and is particularly notable for its dry handling and aquaplaning features. Moreover, Goodyear has already introduced a newer version of the tyre, with likely improved performance.


If you're interested in exploring more about each tyre, you can visit the respective manufacturer's websites: Firestone and Goodyear.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
21
16
4
1
3
5
Best position
#2
#3
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
5.5
12.0
1.0
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2024
2023
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
164
153
111
64
34
63

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison