Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Roadhawk

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

21

16

4

18

1

3

Best position

#2

#3

#1

Average position

11.9

5.5

12.0

6.1

1.0

1.3

Latest test

2024

2023

2025

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

165

153

111

47

66

23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Wet side guide

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Comfort

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Interior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

90%

Costs

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

23%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContact

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponse

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Browse by brand

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Roadhawk

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison