18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Dunlop
Winter
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
21
18
3
3
2
5
Best position
#2
#1
#4
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
6.1
4.3
3.7
1.5
2.2
Latest test
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
165
47
99
36
66
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Dry
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Comfort
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Costs
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store