Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Roadhawk

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

21

18

1

3

4

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

11.9

6.1

1.0

3.7

3.3

1.3

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

165

47

66

36

40

23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Wet side guide

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Comfort

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

90%

Costs

Confidence

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Roadhawk

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison