Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Roadhawk

UltraContact

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Number of tests

21

1

5

1

Best position

#2

#7

#1

Average position

11.9

7.0

2.2

1.0

Latest test

2024

2023

2025

Available sizes

165

88

63

66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Continental UltraContact

58%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Continental UltraContact

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Continental UltraContact

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Continental UltraContact

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Continental UltraContact

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Continental UltraContact

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Continental UltraContact

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Continental UltraContact vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Continental UltraContact vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Continental UltraContact vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Browse by brand

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Roadhawk

UltraContact

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison