Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Firestone (68%). The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the Roadhawk and the EcoContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Firestone Roadhawk has A wet grip rating, whereas 55% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating.
| # | Firestone Roadhawk
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R13 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,2 | 3,7 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Continental EcoContact 6 | 36,4 | 32,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||