18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
21
14
3
4
3
Best position
#2
#8
#1
#2
#2
Average position
11.9
13.4
1.3
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
165
153
23
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Comfort
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Costs
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store