Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Roadhawk

Advantage

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

21

14

28

4

3

Best position

#2

#8

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

13.4

2.3

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

165

153

67

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Continental PremiumContact 7

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Wet performance

Firestone Roadhawk

24%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Continental PremiumContact 7

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry driving behavior

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Dry performance

Firestone Roadhawk

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dry steering response

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Interior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Browse by brand

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk

Advantage

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison