18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
4
1
28
3
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
4.7
3.3
1.0
2.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
146
40
66
68
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dry
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Costs
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Comfort
Confidence
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store