18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
6
4
24
3
28
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
4.7
3.3
2.7
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
146
40
302
36
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet performance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry performance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store