18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
18
4
17
1
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
4.7
6.1
3.3
1.7
1.0
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
146
47
40
80
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store