18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
18
17
4
3
Best position
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
4.7
6.1
1.7
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
146
47
80
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store