18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
6
21
5
4
3
28
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
4.7
11.9
2.2
3.3
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
146
165
63
40
36
67

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison