18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
10
5
4
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
Average position
3.0
6.0
2.8
3.3
Latest test
2017
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
35
109
139
40

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison