18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
18
10
Best position
#3
#1
#2
Average position
3.0
6.1
6.0
Latest test
2017
2024
2026
Available sizes
35
47
109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store