Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Firestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Destination HP

Advantage

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

14

5

3

Best position

#3

#8

#2

#1

#2

Average position

3.0

13.4

5.5

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2017

2026

2025

Available sizes

35

153

700

63

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Firestone Destination HP

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Destination HP

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Firestone Destination HP

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Destination HP

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Destination HP

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Firestone Destination HP

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Comfort

Firestone Destination HP

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Firestone Destination HP

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Firestone Destination HP

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Costs

Firestone Destination HP

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Firestone Destination HP

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone Roadhawk

Firestone Destination HP vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Destination HP vs Cooper ZEON 4xS Sport

Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone Roadhawk 2

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Browse by brand

GT

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Destination HP

Advantage

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison