Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

Firestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Destination HP

Advantage

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

1

14

3

1

5

Best position

#3

#8

#2

#1

Average position

3.0

13.4

3.7

1.0

2.2

Latest test

2017

2026

2025

Available sizes

35

153

36

66

63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Firestone Destination HP

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Destination HP

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet braking

Firestone Destination HP

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Destination HP

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Destination HP

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet handling

Firestone Destination HP

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Comfort

Firestone Destination HP

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Firestone Destination HP

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dry

Firestone Destination HP

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Costs

Firestone Destination HP

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Mileage

Firestone Destination HP

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone Roadhawk

Firestone Destination HP vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Destination HP vs Cooper ZEON 4xS Sport

Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone Roadhawk 2

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Browse by brand

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Destination HP

Advantage

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison