18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS02
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
4
18
29
14
Best position
#7
#1
#1
#1
Average position
12.3
6.1
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2025
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
103
47
180
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken EuroWinter HS02
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken EuroWinter HS02
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Wet side guide
Falken EuroWinter HS02
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Wet circle cornering
Falken EuroWinter HS02
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Dry
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry lane changing
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry steering response
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Snow
Falken EuroWinter HS02
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow traction
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02
57%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Lateral guidance on snow
Falken EuroWinter HS02
33%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%
Comfort
Falken EuroWinter HS02
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Falken EuroWinter HS02
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
Falken EuroWinter HS02
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Costs
Falken EuroWinter HS02
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Mileage
Falken EuroWinter HS02
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store