Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

3

5

4

5

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

3.7

4.4

3.3

2.8

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

36

99

40

139

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Wet braking

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Wet handling

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Wet circle cornering

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Dry handling

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Dry braking

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Rolling resistance

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Mileage

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Exterior noise

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV cars Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Falken e.Ziex vs Maxxis Premitra AS AP3

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Roadhawk 2

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Firehawk Sport

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Browse by brand

GT

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison