18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
3
5
15
1
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.7
2.8
9.0
1.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
36
139
226
66

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison