18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
3
5
18
28
4
5
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.7
2.2
6.1
2.3
3.3
2.8
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
36
63
47
67
40
139

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet braking
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet handling
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry handling
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry lane changing
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison