Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

3

18

1

28

4

5

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

3.7

6.1

1.0

2.3

3.3

2.2

Latest test

2025

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

36

47

66

67

40

63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet handling

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet circle cornering

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry lane changing

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Price/value

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Mileage

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison