Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Duraturn Mozzo Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Duraturn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Duraturn (0%). The first tyre test of Duraturn Mozzo Winter was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 225/55 R17 test, where both the Mozzo Winter and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Duraturn Mozzo Winter
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Duraturn Mozzo Winter Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 3+ | 1- | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 40,7 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Duraturn Mozzo Winter | 37,6 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||