Segment
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Premium2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Kleber (77%). The first tyre test of Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Kleber KRISALP HP3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the SP Winter Response 2 and the KRISALP HP3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Dunlop SP Winter Response 2
| Kleber KRISALP HP3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Premium2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Highly recommended
2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Highly recommended | 1,9 | 2,3 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 1,6 |
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Highly recommended | 2,3 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,5 | 1,8 |
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||