18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

CST
Medallion MD-A1
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
2
3
5
4
Best position
#10
#2
#1
#2
Average position
21.5
3.7
2.8
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
264
36
139
40

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet braking
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet circle cornering
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison