18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Cooper
Zeon CS8
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
18
13
6
1
4
Best position
#9
#1
#1
#3
#1
#2
Average position
19.7
6.1
4.3
4.7
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2024
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
147
47
123
146
66
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Aquaplaning - cross
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet braking
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet handling
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet circle cornering
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dry
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry lane changing
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Offroad
Cooper Zeon CS8
90%
Costs
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Comfort
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store