18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Cooper
Zeon CS8
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
14
14
18
5
4
1
Best position
#9
#1
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
19.7
3.6
6.1
2.2
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
147
194
47
63
40
66

Wet

Wet
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry lane changing
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Offroad

Offroad
Cooper Zeon CS8
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Costs

Costs
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Cooper Zeon CS8
43%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison