18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Cooper CS7 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Cooper
CS7
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
2
4
3
5
Best position
#15
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
15.0
1.5
3.3
3.7
2.8
Latest test
2022
2024
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
71
54
40
36
139

Wet

Wet
Cooper CS7
54%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Cooper CS7
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet braking
Cooper CS7
58%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Wet circle cornering
Cooper CS7
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet handling
Cooper CS7
36%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Cooper CS7
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Cooper CS7
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Cooper CS7
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Cooper CS7
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison