18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Cooper CS7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Cooper
CS7
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
10
4
1
3
Best position
#15
#2
#3
#1
#2
Average position
15.0
6.0
12.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
71
109
111
66
36

Wet

Wet
Cooper CS7
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Cooper CS7
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Cooper CS7
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Cooper CS7
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Cooper CS7
36%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Dry

Dry
Cooper CS7
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Cooper CS7
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Cooper CS7
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Cooper CS7
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison