18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Cooper CS7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Cooper
CS7
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
10
4
3
1
Best position
#15
#2
#3
#2
#1
Average position
15.0
6.0
12.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
71
109
111
36
66

Wet

Wet
Cooper CS7
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Cooper CS7
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Cooper CS7
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Cooper CS7
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Cooper CS7
36%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Cooper CS7
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Cooper CS7
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Cooper CS7
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Cooper CS7
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison