18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Cooper CS7 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Cooper
CS7
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
1
23
3
3
14
Best position
#15
#1
#4
#2
#1
Average position
15.0
3.3
4.3
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2022
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
71
176
99
36
194

Wet

Wet
Cooper CS7
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Cooper CS7
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet braking
Cooper CS7
58%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet circle cornering
Cooper CS7
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet handling
Cooper CS7
36%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Dry

Dry
Cooper CS7
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Cooper CS7
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%

Comfort

Comfort
Cooper CS7
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Interior noise
Cooper CS7
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Exterior noise
Cooper CS7
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison