18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
1
17
14
Best position
#7
#5
#8
Average position
7.0
9.5
13.4
Latest test
2023
2026
2026
Available sizes
88
126
153

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%

Tread pattern comparison

Continental UltraContact
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store