18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
13
1
3
Best position
#7
#1
#1
#2
Average position
7.0
4.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
88
123
66
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Tread pattern comparison

Continental UltraContact
Michelin Primacy 4+
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store