18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

UltraContact wins on dry braking and mileage; Primacy 4+ counters with superior comfort, lower noise, and better wet safety over time.

Both the Continental UltraContact and the Michelin Primacy 4+ sit in the premium summer touring bracket, targeting drivers who want safety, longevity and refinement rather than outright lap times. On paper they look similar — both carry an A wet grip EU label, both promise long tread life — but their personalities diverge in meaningful ways. Continental has engineered the UltraContact around dry confidence and exceptional durability, while Michelin built the Primacy 4+ around the idea of safety made to last, deploying EverGrip technology to keep wet performance honest even as the tread wears down. One is a dry-biased mileage machine; the other is a comfort-first touring tyre that ages more gracefully in the wet.

Continental UltraContact
Good for
High-mileage drivers wanting maximum tyre life Dry-climate drivers prioritising braking confidence Motorway commuters valuing low noise and fuel savings Budget-conscious premium buyers watching cost-per-km
Not ideal for
Drivers frequently encountering heavy standing water Those prioritising the quietest possible motorway ride
Michelin Primacy 4+
Good for
Family car drivers wanting comfort and refinement EV owners prioritising low rolling resistance Drivers in mixed wet and dry conditions Those wanting safety performance maintained as tyre wears
Not ideal for
Drivers who prioritise outright dry braking performance Those wanting the latest-generation wet handling technology

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
1
13
18
1
14
Best position
#7
#1
#1
#1
#2
Average position
7.0
4.3
6.1
1.0
5.5
Latest test
2023
2025
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
87
123
47
66
700

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%

Wet performance is where the comparison becomes more nuanced. Both earn an A wet grip EU label, and both post competitive wet braking numbers — the Primacy 4+ averages 80 across its measured wet braking results, the UltraContact 85, which sounds like a Continental win but the overall wet picture is more complex. The UltraContact's aquaplaning resistance is a documented weakness, scoring just 64.5 versus the Primacy 4+'s 76.9 — a substantial gap that translates into meaningfully less confidence in standing water. The Primacy 4+'s EverGrip compound is specifically designed to maintain wet safety as the tyre wears, which is a real-world advantage over a full tyre life. That said, even the Michelin draws criticism for modest aquaplaning reserves and wet handling that shows its age compared to newer designs — some testers flagged longer stopping distances and slower wet handling times in 2025 testing. Neither tyre is a wet-weather specialist, but the UltraContact's aquaplaning deficit makes it the more exposed of the two in heavy rain.

Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%

On dry roads, the UltraContact has a genuine edge. Its dry braking score of 91 versus the Primacy 4+'s 86.2 is a meaningful gap, and ADAC testing confirmed it as well-balanced with strong dry handling capabilities. The UltraContact feels composed and accurate in everyday dry conditions, with owners noting its confident, planted character on faster roads. The Primacy 4+ is no slouch — testers praised its direct turn-in, precise steering response and safe handling dynamics on dry asphalt — but it doesn't match the UltraContact's stopping bite. In their one shared test, the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 assessment across 50 tyres, the Primacy 4+ finished 3rd overall and the UltraContact 7th, suggesting the Michelin's broader balance tips the overall result even if Continental wins the individual dry braking metric.

Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

This is where the Primacy 4+ makes its clearest case. Its comfort score of 86.6 and noise rating of 84.1 comfortably outclass the UltraContact's 75 across both metrics, and the test data backs this up: Tyre Reviews rated the Primacy 4+ best-in-test for comfort and second-quietest in its 2025 assessment. Real owners consistently echo this — one Mercedes E-Class owner who switched to the UltraContact specifically praised how extremely quiet it became on motorways, yet the Primacy 4+ still scores higher on the same dimension. On rolling resistance, the Primacy 4+ again leads, with a score of 82.4 versus the UltraContact's more average fuel efficiency — though Continental owners do report improved fuel consumption compared to prior tyres. On mileage, both perform well: the UltraContact scores an impressive 88 for projected wear, confirmed by ADAC as delivering very high tyre life, while the Primacy 4+ sits at 83.8 — both strong, but the UltraContact nudges ahead for pure longevity.

Tread pattern comparison

Continental UltraContact
Michelin Primacy 4+
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Verdict

The Michelin Primacy 4+ is the more rounded tyre for most touring drivers — quieter, more comfortable, better in standing water, and engineered to maintain wet safety as it wears, which matters over a long tyre life. It suits family car drivers, EV owners sensitive to rolling resistance, and anyone who values a refined daily drive above all else. Its successor, the Michelin Primacy 5, is now available and worth checking if you want the most current generation. The Continental UltraContact makes the most sense for drivers who spend the majority of their time on dry roads and want the longest possible tyre life — its dry braking performance is genuinely strong, and its mileage credentials are excellent. It's the right call for high-mileage motorway users in predominantly dry climates who are less concerned about aquaplaning reserves. For most mixed-condition European driving, the Primacy 4+ edges it on balance.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store