18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Michelin leads on refinement and aquaplaning; Continental counters with sharper dry braking.

Both the Continental UltraContact and the Michelin Primacy 4+ sit in the premium summer touring bracket, but they are built around different priorities. Continental has engineered the UltraContact as a dry-performance and longevity specialist — a tyre that stops short on sunny roads and lasts a very long time. Michelin takes a different line with the Primacy 4+, which succeeds the Primacy 4 and positions itself around sustained safety over the tyre's lifetime, pairing that promise with exceptional comfort and refinement. In their one shared head-to-head, an ADAC 2023 test of 205/55 R16, the Primacy 4+ finished third overall against the UltraContact's seventh — a gap that tells most of the story.

Continental UltraContact
Good for
Drivers prioritising dry braking performance High-mileage users wanting durable rubber Budget-aware buyers in the premium segment Predominantly dry-climate drivers
Not ideal for
Drivers frequently facing heavy rain or standing water Those prioritising cabin refinement and low noise Drivers wanting class-leading wet handling
Michelin Primacy 4+
Good for
Comfort-focused motorway drivers EV and hybrid owners watching fuel consumption Drivers running tyres to low tread depths Those wanting an all-round balanced premium tyre
Not ideal for
Drivers demanding maximum dry braking performance Those wanting the latest-generation wet performance Price-sensitive buyers — premium cost applies

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
13
18
4
3
Best position
#7
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
7.0
4.3
6.1
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2023
2025
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
88
123
47
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

The wet picture is more nuanced. The UltraContact holds a slight advantage on wet braking scores, but its aquaplaning resistance is a meaningful weak point — one that independent testing and its own performance data make difficult to overlook. Drivers who cover a lot of ground in heavy rain should take note. The Primacy 4+ offers better aquaplaning reserves and was built with Michelin's EverGrip technology to maintain wet safety as the tyre wears down — a genuine differentiator for those who run tyres to lower tread depths. The caveat is that the Primacy 4+'s wet performance overall has drawn criticism for showing its age compared to newer designs, with some test programmes highlighting longer wet stopping distances and slower wet handling times than fresher rivals. Neither tyre is a wet specialist, but the Michelin's aquaplaning advantage and longevity-focused compound design give it the more dependable wet profile across the full tyre lifecycle.

Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

The UltraContact is where Continental's dry credentials are hardest to argue with. Its dry braking score is the stronger of the two, and ADAC testing in 2023 confirmed a balanced, capable character on dry tarmac with good handling dynamics. The Michelin Primacy 4+ is no slouch — independent tests consistently credit it with short dry stopping distances and precise, direct turn-in — but the UltraContact has the edge when conditions are warm and sunny. Where the Michelin impresses is in its steering feel; multiple test programmes have noted natural, communicative feedback that makes it easy to drive at the limit on dry roads without the mild vagueness that has occasionally been noted in the UltraContact's dry handling response.

Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

This is where the Michelin Primacy 4+ most clearly separates itself. Comfort and noise scores sit meaningfully higher than the UltraContact's, and real-world owners consistently report a smooth, quiet motorway experience as the tyre's strongest quality. One owner switching from a different brand to the UltraContact noted a significant improvement in cabin quietness and fuel consumption — which speaks well for Continental — but the Michelin still leads in this department by a measurable margin. Rolling resistance is also better on the Primacy 4+, which earns it a natural fit for EV and hybrid drivers watching energy consumption. Both tyres offer strong mileage credentials, with the UltraContact notably strong on projected tread life, which is one of its most consistently praised attributes across test programmes and owner feedback alike.

Tread pattern comparison

Continental UltraContact
Michelin Primacy 4+
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Verdict

For most drivers, the Michelin Primacy 4+ is the more well-rounded choice. It delivers a more refined daily experience, better aquaplaning protection, lower rolling resistance, and a higher overall rating backed by multiple test victories. The sustained safety promise across the tyre's lifespan is a credible and meaningful advantage for higher-mileage users. The Continental UltraContact earns its place for drivers who prioritise dry braking confidence above all else and value the UltraContact's impressive tread longevity — it is a solid, practical tyre that delivers where it counts on clear roads. But against the Primacy 4+'s more complete profile, it plays a narrower game.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store